I'd like to submit that this is because the market is no longer a bi-partisan issue. And, when there is no big VS in the picture, the media covers something fair.
The current issue with the market is how much it should be regulated. NOT, whether it should be regulated at all! This is a departure from the more common Free Market vs Regulation model we've seen for the past many years.
Also, I think it must be noted that covering finance requires an interest in finance. Therefore, articles on that subject will more than likely be from writers who either aren't as familiar with or aren't as interested in politics.
All in all it makes for refreshingly solid coverage.
2 comments:
Didn't Dr. Pimpare already make the point that (quoting Ezra Klein) that the media seems to only cover controversy? (see: http://crankydocs.blogspot.com/2008/09/blame-media.html)
I think that your point is valid and I'm glad that the candidates are concerned with the issue. Furthermore, I am glad that neither of them are making a controversy here when there really should not be one as they often tend to do.
I'm not quite sure what your last paragraph meant. Could you elaborate?
Post a Comment